ArticleCommunications biology2025
Deep learning-based detection of murine congenital heart defects from µCT scans.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micro-computed tomography (μCT) provides 3D images of congenital heart defects (CHD) in mice. However, diagnosing CHD from μCT scans is time-consuming and requires clinical expertise. Here, we present a deep learning approach to automatically segment and screen normal from malformed hearts. On a cohort of 139 μCT scans of control and mutant mice, our diagnosis model achieves an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 97%. For further validation, we acquired two additional cohorts after model training. Performance on a similar 'prospective' cohort is excellent (AUC: 100%). Performance on a 'divergent' cohort containing novel genotypes is moderate (AUC: 81%), but improves markedly after model finetuning (AUC: 91%), showcasing robustness and adaptability to technical and biological differences in the data. A user-friendly Napari plugin allows researchers without coding expertise to utilize and retrain the model. Our pipeline will accelerate diagnosis of heart anomalies in mice and facilitate mechanistic studies of CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.