ArticleScientific reports2025
The sobol sensitivity analysis of the pressure, stresses, and displacement arising from poroelastic modelling of hard mechanical systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We perform a sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of material input parameters on the pressure, stresses, and displacement of an isotropic porous solid cylinder representing hard mechanical systems such as the bone. We model the system using the governing equations of Biot's poroelasticity in cylindrical polar coordinates, where the solutions are found by enforcing radial boundary conditions. The sensitivity analysis is carried out on the solutions for the pressure, stress components and displacement using ranges of the investigated parameters representative of the bone. Our study finds that the time [Formula: see text] has the highest influence on the pressure, the stress components and displacements. We find that the Poisson ratio ν plays a greater role than shear μ in the pressure response, and the shear μ counts more than the other parameters in the radial and circumferential stresses. There are key joint interactions between the Biot's coefficient α and the Poisson ratio ν, the non-dimensionalised radius [Formula: see text] of the bone, and the Biot's modulus M when investigating interstitial pressure, which is a key value in bone remodelling and fracture healing. This study paves the way to a deeper understanding of the interplay of all the parameters that are necessary to capture the true behaviour of hard mechanical systems such as the bone and its potential remodelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.