Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436661›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2026

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of keratoconus: multi-centric study from India.

Samrat Chatterjee, Neha Kapur, Sanil Sawant, Neha Jain, Virender Singh Sangwan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samrat ChatterjeeDepartment of Cornea and Anterior Segment, MGM Eye Institute, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. samrat@mgmeye.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3799-2974
Neha KapurDepartment of Cornea and Anterior Segment, Dr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sanil SawantDepartment of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Sadguru Netra Chikitsalaya, Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Neha JainDepartment of Cornea and Anterior Segment, LJ Eye Institute, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Virender Singh SangwanDepartment of Cornea and Anterior Segment, Dr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to determine if the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with keratoconus had changed in recent times.

methodsThis prospective multicentre study was conducted at four tertiary eye institutes in India between October 2022 and September 2023. Only patients newly diagnosed with keratoconus were included in the study.

resultsThe mean age of the 421 patients was 23.5 ± 8.9 years, and there were 249 (59.1%) male and 170 (40.9%) female patients. The highest prevalence (44.89%) was observed between the ages of 20 and 29. Females were younger than males (P = 0.040). The onset of symptoms preceded the diagnosis by 2.7 ± 4.3 years. A total of 298 patients (70.8%) were from the urban areas. The majority of patients (79.1%) belonged to the middle socioeconomic class (P < 0.001), and 251 (59.6%) had obtained a graduate or higher degree (P < 0.001). The most common sign in mild keratoconus was scissors reflex. Binocular vision impairment was absent in 259 patients (61.5%), whereas the rest had some degree of impairment. Keratoconus was asymmetrical in 36.1% of the patients. Clinical signs were absent in 5% of the patients.

conclusionDespite advances in corneal imaging and awareness about keratoconus, patients were still being diagnosed in the third decade of life. The presence of scissors reflex in patients coming for refraction should alert eyecare professionals to the presence of keratoconus, and corneal tomography should be advised in these patients.

Indexed as

KeratoconusAdolescentAdultAge DistributionChildCorneaCorneal TopographyFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesSex DistributionVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID41436661
PMCPMC12881551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.