ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Primary tumour response on breast MRI as a predictor of axillary pathologic response in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate whether breast radiologic response on breast MRI can predict axillary pathologic response (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the total study population and in subgroups according to clinical nodal (cN)-status and oestrogen receptor (ER)-expression. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective single-centre study consecutively included breast cancer patients who, between 2012 and 2022, had undergone baseline and post-NACT breast MRI. Measures of predictive ability, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed for cN-status and ER expression.
resultsOf 251 included patients, 48.6% were cN0 and 34.7% had ER-negative tumours. For axillary pathologic response prediction by breast MRI, the sensitivity was 84%, specificity 40.4%, PPV 48.3%, NPV 79.2%, and DOR 3.6 (95% CI: 1.83-7.00). The probability of achieving ypN0 was 60.2% in all patients, 82% in cN0 patients versus 39.5% in cN+ patients, and 78.2% in ER-negative tumours versus 50.6% in ER-positive tumours. High NPVs were observed in cN0 patients (92%) and ER-negative tumours (90.1%) and were lower in cN+ patients (62.2%) and ER-positive tumours (72.2%).
conclusionsThe probability of ypN+ given breast complete response on breast MRI was below 10% in cN0 patients and ER-negative tumours. Therefore, in these subgroups, breast complete response on breast MRI may be clinically useful to exclude ypN+. In cN+ patients and ER-positive tumours, due to lower NPVs, breast complete response on breast MRI may not be clinically useful to exclude ypN+. KEY POINTS: Question Accurate non-invasive methods to differentiate between patients with and without axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to axillary surgery are currently lacking. Findings Breast complete response on MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicates a low probability (< 10%) of axillary residual disease in clinically node-negative patients and oestrogen receptor-negative tumours. Clinical relevance Breast complete response on MRI may be a non-invasive, clinically useful tool to exclude patients with axillary residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to axillary surgery and guide patient selection for potential de-escalation of axillary treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.