ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of OECD guideline data and Tox21 assays to improve reproductive and developmental toxicity prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Identification of New Dual PAK4 and NAMPT Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Environmental estrogens and animal reproductive health: mechanisms, biomarkers, and intervention approaches.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproductive and developmental toxicities pose major challenges in chemical safety evaluation because adverse effects can span generations. Conventional in vivo OECD Test Guideline (TG) assays provide robust hazard characterization but require large animal cohorts and extended study periods. In this study, datasets from OECD TG-compliant studies were compiled to identify the mechanistic drivers of toxicity. To complement these data, we integrated high-throughput in vitro results from the U.S. Tox21 program, which evaluates > 10,000 chemicals in human cell-based assays targeting nuclear receptor modulation, oxidative stress, and DNA damage. By aligning OECD TG outcomes with Tox21 profiles, we assessed the associations between in vivo reproductive/developmental toxicity and in vitro mechanistic endpoints using the Toxicity Predictor program. Our analysis suggested that OECD TG 414-, TG 421-, and TG 422-positive chemicals were negatively associated with thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) antagonists, farnesoid X receptor (FXR) antagonists, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR δ) antagonists, transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) agonists, and endoplasmic reticulum stress response (ERsr) agonists in the Tox21 assays. Conversely, OECD TG 416- and TG 443-positive chemicals showed a positive association with histone deacetylase (HDAC) antagonists. Overall, the regulation of miRNA transcription, nuclear receptor activity, and transcription pathways showed significant associations that may indicate key mechanistic links between in vitro and in vivo datasets. These associations may provide supportive insights for considering how alternative data sources could complement existing regulatory toxicology frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.