SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2026
Breast cancer incidence and subtype patterns among BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes essential for DNA repair. Mutations in these genes significantly increase breast (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk, with BRCA1-positive facing a 70% BC and 40% OC lifetime risk. While guidelines for BRCA-positive are well established, recommendations for BC surveillance in BRCA-patients already diagnosed with OC remain limited. This meta-analysis evaluates BC risk post-OC in BRCA-mutated women.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Single-arm outcomes were pooled using meta-analysis of proportions, and survival data were synthesized using hazard ratio (HR), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. All analyses were conducted in R (version 4.3.2).
resultsA total of 2380 patients from 10 retrospective cohort studies were included. Among them, 181 (8%; 95% CI: 6%-11%) developed BC post-OC, with similar rates observed for BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutated (9%; 95% CI: 7%-12%). In overall survival analysis, BRCA-mutated patients who developed BC after OC had significantly improved outcomes compared to those with OC only (HR = 0.4657; P < 0.001).
conclusionThis meta-analysis underscores the need for tailored BC surveillance and evidence-based screening guidelines in BRCA-mutated OC survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.