ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
We're talking about practice: examining the shifting role of FLS in surgical education.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2004, the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons launched the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program to ensure surgeons had the minimum knowledge, judgment, and technical skills to perform basic laparoscopic operations. Since FLS's implementation, laparoscopic surgery rates have risen, and its role as a summative assessment has shifted as programs introduce FLS earlier in training. We hypothesize that surgical trainees only practice laparoscopy in a box trainer to complete FLS and seek to define the relationship of FLS and attitudes toward the independent practice of laparoscopy in general surgery trainees.
methodsA survey was distributed to three general surgery residency programs using five-point Likert, nominal, and ratio scales to collect data on independent laparoscopy practice, opinions on FLS skills, and its role in preparing for operative cases. Data analysis focused on response rates of answer choices.
resultsOf the 88 residents polled, thirty-one residents responded to the survey (35%), of which 45.2% (14) have passed the FLS exam. The first-time pass rate was 100%. Approximately, one-third of residents who completed FLS state they regularly practiced laparoscopy before FLS completion (28.6% agree, 7.1% strongly agree). That number decreased to 7.1% after FLS completion (7.1% agree, 0% strongly agree). About half of residents only practice skills from the FLS skills test (19.4% strongly agree, 29.0% agree). Yet, only a third (32.3%) agreed that FLS skills are transferable to complex laparoscopy cases.
conclusionsSimulated laparoscopic practice decreases after completion of FLS, and the majority of residents only engage in practice using FLS skills. FLS has become the main driver of independent laparoscopic practice for many residents. An emphasis on self-directed learning and expanded laparoscopic skills taught in simulation could increase time spent practicing and more easily transfer skills to the operating room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.