ArticleScientific reports2025
Consistency evaluation and performance optimization of deep learning-based auto-contouring for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contour delineation is crucial for ensuring the efficacy and side effects of radiotherapy (RT), but it inevitably involves inter-observer variability (IOV). Deep learning (DL) models have been used to assist in contour delineation, but further evaluation is needed to guide healthcare professionals in the judicious application of DL models. The contours of 22 anatomical structures and the gross tumor volume (GTV) for 30 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were delineated using four DL models: AccuContour, RT-Viewer-contour, RT-Mind, and PVmed Contouring. The overall kappa values and generalized conformity indices of these contours were calculated to assess consistency. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Relative Volume Difference (RVD), 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the contours. Additionally, two innovative model frameworks were introduced to improve the fidelity and reliability of patient contour delineation. The consistency of the contours generated by the four DL models was poor for GTV, pituitary gland, temporal lobes, and temporomandibular joints. Marked differences were still observed between the contours generated by the models and the manual delineations by oncologists for the GTV, lens, optic nerves, pituitary glands temporomandibular joints, temporal lobes, and trachea. The model frameworks we proposed can effectively optimize the contours of GTV, brainstem, eyes, lens, and temporomandibular joints. The contours generated by DL models still have deficiencies in the application of nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy. To address this, two model frameworks were proposed to increase the robustness of automatic contouring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.