ArticleScientific reports2025
Boundary-enhanced sparse transformer for generalizable and accurate medical image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical image segmentation is a fundamental task in computer-aided diagnosis, playing a crucial role in organ structure analysis, lesion delineation, and treatment planning. However, current Transformer-based segmentation networks still face two major challenges. First, the global self-attention in the encoder often introduces redundant connections, leading to high computational cost and potential interference from irrelevant tokens. Second, the decoder shows limited capability in reconstructing fine-grained boundary structures, resulting in blurred segmentation contours. To address these issues, we proposed an efficient and accurate framework for general medical image segmentation. Specifically, in the encoder, we introduce a frequency-domain similarity measure and construct a Key-Semantic Dictionary (KSD) via amplitude spectrum cosine similarity. This enables stage-wise sparse attention matrices that reduce redundancy and enhance semantic relevance. In the decoder, we design a learnable gradient-based operator that injects boundary-aware logits bias into the attention mechanism, thereby improving structural detail recovery along object boundaries. On ACDC, the framework delivers a 0.55% gain in average Dice and a 14.6% reduction in HD over the second-best baseline. On ISIC 2018, it achieves increases of 1.01% in Dice and 0.21% in ACC over the second-best baseline, while using 88.8% fewer parameters than typical Transformer-based models. On Synapse, it surpasses the strongest prior approach by 1.03% in Dice and 6.35% in HD, yielding up to 8.36% Dice improvement and 52.46% HD reduction compared with widely adopted Transformer baselines. Comprehensive results confirm that the proposed frequency-domain sparse attention and learnable edge-guided decoding effectively balance segmentation accuracy, boundary fidelity, and computational cost. This framework not only suppresses redundant global correlations and enhances structural detail reconstruction, but is also robust to different medical imaging modalities, providing a lightweight and clinically applicable solution for high-precision medical image segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.