Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436505›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Graph neural network-driven text classification for fire-door defect inspection in pre-completion construction.

Seunghyeon Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Seunghyeon WangInstitute for Environmental Design and Engineering, University College London(UCL), London, WC1H 0NN, UK. seung-hyun.wang@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defective fire doors in apartment buildings pose significant risks by undermining fire safety measures, enabling the rapid spread of smoke and fire, and potentially endangering residents' lives. To address this critical safety issue, this research develops and evaluates four Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based text classification models-TextGCN, TextING, TensorGCN, and BERT-GCN-for the automatic identification of fire-door defects. By systematically optimizing both general and model-specific hyperparameters, a comprehensive evaluation involving 1008 model variants was conducted using multiple performance metrics. Among these, the optimized BERT-GCN model demonstrated superior performance, achieving notable F1 scores on the test dataset across various defect categories: frame gap (91.28%), door closer adjustment (90.52%), contamination (70.75%), dent (90.21%), scratch (90.34%), sealing components (90.29%), mechanical operation components (90.29%), and others (69.99%). Overall, BERT-GCN achieved an average F1 score of 85.46%, surpassing the performance of 2,430 other evaluated text classification models. These results highlight the strong potential and effectiveness of GNN-based approaches for enhancing safety management practices in construction environments.

Indexed as

Building maintenanceDeep learningFire door defectGraph neural networkText mining

Identifiers

PMID41436505
PMCPMC12727865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.