ArticleScientific reports2025
Graph neural network-driven text classification for fire-door defect inspection in pre-completion construction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training-FreeDetector-to-Promptable-Segmenter Integration for Stacked Cartons: Prompt Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Offs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Object Detection and Scene Perception for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Using LM-JEPA.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defective fire doors in apartment buildings pose significant risks by undermining fire safety measures, enabling the rapid spread of smoke and fire, and potentially endangering residents' lives. To address this critical safety issue, this research develops and evaluates four Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based text classification models-TextGCN, TextING, TensorGCN, and BERT-GCN-for the automatic identification of fire-door defects. By systematically optimizing both general and model-specific hyperparameters, a comprehensive evaluation involving 1008 model variants was conducted using multiple performance metrics. Among these, the optimized BERT-GCN model demonstrated superior performance, achieving notable F1 scores on the test dataset across various defect categories: frame gap (91.28%), door closer adjustment (90.52%), contamination (70.75%), dent (90.21%), scratch (90.34%), sealing components (90.29%), mechanical operation components (90.29%), and others (69.99%). Overall, BERT-GCN achieved an average F1 score of 85.46%, surpassing the performance of 2,430 other evaluated text classification models. These results highlight the strong potential and effectiveness of GNN-based approaches for enhancing safety management practices in construction environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.