ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent particle filtering state observer for stability assessment in solar-wind penetrated microgrids.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents an advanced Intelligent Particle Filtering State Observer (PFSO) for real-time voltage and frequency stability assessment in microgrids integrated with high-penetration solar and wind energy sources. The proposed method leverages the robustness of PFSO to address the nonlinear, stochastic, and dynamic behaviors inherent in renewable-based distributed generation systems. A comprehensive state-space model of the microgrid is developed, and the PFSO is employed to estimate unmeasurable or noisy system states in the presence of process and measurement uncertainties. The proposed method was validated in MATLAB/Simulink across three scenarios: normal operation, sudden power mismatch, and periodic load disturbance. Quantitative results demonstrate that the PFSO maintains high estimation accuracy, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values consistently below 0.0095 per unit (p.u.) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) under 0.0073 p.u. for both voltage and frequency states. The maximum estimation error remained below 0.020 p.u., confirming strong robustness under transient conditions. Furthermore, a binary classification analysis of system stability, using a 0.95 p.u. threshold achieved 97.4% accuracy, 95.9% precision, and an F1-score of 96.5% across all cases. The findings validate the effectiveness of the proposed PFSO as a reliable tool for dynamic state estimation and early instability detection in smart microgrid environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.