ArticleScientific data2025
Multimodal biomechanical dataset from transtibial amputees and able-bodied adults across five locomotion tasks.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal biomechanical dataset from transtibial amputees and able-bodied adults across five locomotion tasks.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This dataset addresses the need for multimodal biomechanical recordings during over-ground walking, ramps, and stairs by synchronously capturing electromyographic (EMG), inertial (IMU), and plantar pressure data. We collected data from 45 adults (15 with unilateral transtibial amputation and 30 without amputation) who completed five standardized locomotor tasks: level walking, ramp ascent/descent, and stair ascent/descent. Each participant performed 50 supervised trials. Wireless EMG and IMU sensors (Delsys Trigno Avanti) measured muscle activation and kinematics, while intelligent insoles (XSENSOR) captured plantar pressure distribution. Raw data were saved in.hpf (EMG/IMU) and.XSN (pressure) formats, with processed outputs in.csv files. All data are organized by task and sensor type, including complete participant metadata. Key dataset outputs include time-normalized EMG amplitudes, segment kinematics, and pressure maps across terrains and populations. The dataset was validated technically and experimentally during the acquisition. This resource enables quantitative analysis of gait adaptation and supports machine learning for locomotion classification. Data are provided in accessible formats to foster reuse in biomechanics, rehabilitation engineering, robotics, and clinical gait research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.