ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
Evaluation of high-throughput sequencing for replacing the conventional adventitious virus detection assays used for biologics.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Report of the fourth conference on next-generation sequencing (NGS) for adventitious virus detection in biologics for humans and animals: Validation and implementation of NGS.Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing (HTS) can detect known and novel adventitious viruses in biological materials that might be missed by the conventional in vitro and in vivo assays. We compared HTS with the conventional assays using the same sample preparation of CHO cell harvest spiked with human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and mammalian orthoreovirus (Reo1). The viruses were selected with the expectation that one would produce a positive result in each test. The study results indicated both RSV and Reo1 were detected by HTS and in vitro assays, albeit with inter-assay and intra-lab differences in sensitivity of virus detection, and only Reo1 was detected by the in vivo assays. The results support using HTS to replace the in vivo assays. Additionally, based on capabilities of HTS for non-targeted virus detection, it may supplement or replace the in vitro assays. The study further highlighted that the analytical sensitivity of HTS can be improved.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.