ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Evidence for Abstract Codes in Parietal Cortex Guiding Prospective Working Memory.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent past helps us predict and prepare for the near future. Such preparation relies on working memory (WM) which actively maintains and manipulates information providing a temporal bridge. Numerous studies have shown that recently presented visual stimuli can be decoded from fMRI signals in visual cortex (VC) and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), suggesting that these areas sustain the recent past. Yet, in many cases, concrete, sensory signals of past information must be transformed into the abstract codes to guide future cognition. However, this process remains poorly understood. Here, human participants of either sex used WM to maintain a separate spatial location in each hemifield wherein locations were embedded in a learned spatial sequence. On each trial, participants made a sequence-match decision to a probe and then updated their WM with the probe. The same abstract sequence guided judgments in each hemifield, allowing the separate detection of concrete spatial locations (hemifield-specific) and abstract sequence positions (hemifield-general) and also tracking of representations of the past (last location/position) and future (next location/position). Consistent with previous reports, concrete past locations held in WM could be decoded from VC and IPS. Moreover, in anticipation of the probe, representations shifted from past to future locations in both areas. Critically, we observed abstract coding of future sequence positions in the IPS whose magnitude related to speeded performance. These data suggest that the IPS sustains abstract codes to facilitate future preparation and reveal a transformation of the sensory past into abstract codes guiding future behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.