Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436274›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Clinical relevance of screening for ECG abnormalities in 67-year-old Danes: a population-based cohort study from the Viborg Screening Programme (VISP).

David Van Der Giessen, Annette Høgh, Dorte Svenstrup, Jes S Lindholt, Marie Dahl

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03395509 (Intersectional Screening Program for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases Among 67-years Old Citizens of the Municipal of Viborg), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03395509 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Intersectional Screening Program for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases Among 67-years Old Citizens of the Municipal of Viborg

TypeobservationalSponsorCentral Jutland Regional HospitalRan2014 to 2029Enrolled4,500ConditionsAging, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Hypertension, Mass Screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Van Der GiessenVascular Research Unit, Department of Vascular Surgery, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Annette HøghVascular Research Unit, Department of Vascular Surgery, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7525-9007
Dorte SvenstrupDepartment of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Jes S LindholtDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Marie DahlVascular Research Unit, Department of Vascular Surgery, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark marie.dahl@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-1709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the point prevalence of major ECG abnormalities, their coexistence with screen-detected cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the proportion requiring referral for cardiac work-up and interventions.

designA population-based cohort study.

settingPrimary and secondary care settings in Denmark.

participantsSince 2014, all 67-year-old Danish men and women from Viborg municipality were invited to the 'Viborg Screening Programme' (VISP).

interventionsVISP includes screening for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD), carotid plaque (CP), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), hypertension, diabetes mellitus and cardiac conditions. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A single resting 12-lead ECG was recorded and coded using the Minnesota criteria. Major ECG abnormalities were divided into rhythm and rate disorders, signs of myocardial damage and conduction disorders.

resultsOver the first 5 years, 4612 (83.8% of those invited) were screened, with 4437 (96.4%) undergoing an ECG. We found major ECG abnormalities in 152 (3.4%), including 92 (2.1%) rhythm and rate disorders, 28 (0.6%) with signs of myocardial damage and 32 (0.7%) with conduction disorders. Fifty-nine (1.3%) had newly screen-detected ECG abnormalities, and 34 (0.8%) required intervention after cardiac consultation (32 medication adjustments and/or 11 advanced treatments). Participants with major ECG abnormalities had a higher frequency of coexisting CVD, including CP (46.4% vs 38.1%; p=0.040), LEAD (9.5% vs 5.3%; p=0.026) and AAA (2.7% vs 0.9%; p=0.032) and were also more common in men than in women (4.7% vs 2.2%; p<0.001). Adjusted OR showed significantly higher risk for screen-detected major ECG abnormalities in current smokers (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.09), but a lower risk in participants using lipid-lowering medication (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.80).

conclusionThis study provides a detailed overview of major ECG abnormalities in a population-based cardiovascular screening context. Although the yield of ECG screening was low, ECG may still add value as a simple and low-cost tool within multimodal programmes, enabling timely detection and treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03395509.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesElectrocardiographyMass ScreeningAgedClinical RelevanceCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceReferral and ConsultationScandinavians and Nordic PeopleAdult cardiologyCardiovascular DiseaseCoronary heart diseaseMyocardial infarctionPreventive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID41436274
PMCPMC12750771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.