Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436272›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Organ donation for research purposes: a qualitative focus group study on the views of donor families, transplant recipients and heart failure patients in the UK.

John Onsy Louca, Nicole Asemota, Johanna Thren, Alex Manara, Sai Bhagra, Lu Wang, Johannes Bargehr, Nigel Burton, Sue Burton, Karen Rockell and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

John Onsy LoucaCambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK jol20@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0169-0798
Nicole AsemotaDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Johanna ThrenDepartment of Anthropology, University of Durham, Durham, England, UK.
Alex ManaraIntensive Care Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0584-7222
Sai BhagraDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Lu WangDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Johannes BargehrCambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Nigel BurtonDonor Family Network, Bexley, UK.
Sue BurtonDonor Family Network, Bexley, UK.
Karen RockellUK Organ Donor Transplant Research Network, Peterborough, UK.
Joao Pedro NuñesDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Paul WhiteAddenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Marius BermanDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Stephen PettitDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Antonio RubinoDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
Amir ReyahiLuton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Luton, England, UK.
Stephen LargeDepartment of Transplantation, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-6344
Sanjay SinhaCambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Catherine WilsonDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeclined donor organs and explanted recipient organs may hold considerable value for biomedical research, particularly in advancing knowledge of disease mechanisms and supporting drug development. However, public perceptions of such use, and preferences for how consent should be obtained, remain underexplored.

methodsFour workshops were held across the UK to examine the views of organ donor families and transplant recipients regarding the use of human organs in research, with a focus on myocardial regeneration. Each workshop included three brief presentations on transplantation and cardiac regeneration, followed by facilitated small-group discussions. Observational notes were taken to capture participants' perspectives on the use of organs unsuitable for transplantation. A follow-up survey generated both quantitative and qualitative data, the latter analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants expressed strong support for the use of declined donor and explanted recipient organs in research. Transplant recipients frequently cited a desire to give back to the National Health Service (NHS), while donor families viewed research use as a meaningful way to honour their loved ones when transplantation was not possible.

conclusionThis exploratory study highlights widespread support for using non-transplantable organs in research among individuals with personal experience of transplantation. The findings suggest a need for further research into how best to support and inform potential donors and families. Participants emphasised the importance of sensitive communication, clear consent processes and transparency regarding the use of donated organs.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFamilyHeart FailureTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsTransplant RecipientsAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInformed ConsentMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomDrug TherapyHeart failureTransplant surgery

Identifiers

PMID41436272
PMCPMC12730744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.