Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436264›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Beliefs about medicines in relation to the initiation of cardiovascular preventive medications during a 3 year follow-up period after inclusion in the VIPVIZA trial: a cohort study.

Eva Sönnerstam, Henrik Holmberg, Bo Carlberg, Margareta Norberg, Anders Själander, E-L Glader

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01849575 (Direct VIsualiZAtion of Asymptomatic Atherosclerotic Disease for Optimum Cardiovascular Prevention. A Population Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial Within Västerbotten Intervention Programme), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01849575 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Direct VIsualiZAtion of Asymptomatic Atherosclerotic Disease for Optimum Cardiovascular Prevention. A Population Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial Within Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) and Ordinary Care.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2013 to 2027Enrolled3,532ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsIntervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva SönnerstamDepartment of Medical and Translational Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden eva.sonnerstam@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6744-8553
Henrik HolmbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bo CarlbergDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-2791
Margareta NorbergDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-7131
Anders SjälanderDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-1186
E-L GladerDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4095-6501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate if beliefs about medicines affect the time to the initiation of cardiovascular preventive medications during a 3 year follow-up period.

designA questionnaire and register-based cohort study.

settingPrimary care in Sweden, in which people 40, 50 and 60 years old underwent risk factor screening and individual health promotion within the Västerbotten intervention programme (VIP).

participantsPeople at low/medium risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) according to the risk factor screening were included in the MEASURES: The primary outcome was time to the binary event of initiating antihypertensives or lipid-lowering agents, identified within the time frame from inclusion in the VIPVIZA study until the study participants' 3 year follow-up visit. General beliefs about medicines were assessed according to the BMQ. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for sex, were conducted to investigate primary outcome.

resultsParticipants with stronger general beliefs about medicines being overused had significantly longer time to initiation of antihypertensive drugs in the control group (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.996) but not in the intervention group (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.16). No significant associations were found between beliefs about medicines and initiation of lipid-lowering treatment.

conclusionsA more negative perception of drugs being overused was significantly associated with delayed initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment. Our results suggest that the VIPVIZA intervention may overbridge negative perceptions and affect the initiation of antihypertensive medications in a positive manner. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01849575 (date of registration: 8 May 2013).

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAntihypertensive AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePrimary PreventionSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseaseDrug TherapyMedication AdherencePrimary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID41436264
PMCPMC12730765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.