Observational studyLupus science & medicine2025
Combining mepacrine with hydroxychloroquine-based therapy in active systemic lupus erythematosus: an observational study of 106 patients from the Lupus-Cruces cohort.
Observational study in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The 2026 British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the management of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of mepacrine (MC) as an add-on therapy in patients with SLE unresponsive to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)-containing regimens at 6 months after MC introduction.
methodsObservational study using routine clinical care data of patients from the Lupus-Cruces cohort. All of them received therapy with HCQ and prednisone at baseline. Two groups of initial therapy were compared: single therapy (ST; HCQ + prednisone) and multiple therapy (MT; additional immunosuppressives or biologics). Achieving the definition of remission in SLE (DORIS) at 6 months was the main outcome. Prednisone tapering and MC side effects and discontinuation were also analysed. A logistic regression was performed in search of clinical predictors of response.
results106 different episodes were included (ST=56, MT=50). The mean SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) at baseline was 6.7, with a mean prednisone dose of 6 mg/day. DORIS remission at 6 months was 71% for the complete cohort (ST 79% vs MT 62%, p=0.06). SLEDAI reduction at 6 months was similar in both groups (mean 4.6 points in the ST group vs 5 in the MT group, p=0.5). The reduction at 6 months was also similar (mean 1.75 mg/day in the ST group vs 1.69 mg/day in the MT group, p=0.9). The most frequent reason for MC discontinuation was improvement (45%). Adverse effects were reported in 17% patients.
conclusionsMC is a useful therapy in mild-moderate active SLE. Using MC as the first drug after the failure of glucocorticoids and HCQ is the best option; however, the addition of MC to a multidrug regimen can also be of help.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.