ArticleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2025
Prognostic factors identification using machine learning in temporomandibular disorder treatment responders.
Article in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporomandibular disorders (TMD) are complex chronic conditions that significantly impair quality of life and impose a considerable social and economic burden. Although various treatment strategies have been developed, the prognostic factors influencing therapeutic outcomes remain poorly defined. This study aimed to identify relevant prognostic factors for treatment response using machine learning methods, with patient readiness for discharge serving as the primary outcome.
methodsA total of 1050 medical records from patients diagnosed with TMD and treated at the Orofacial Pain and Dental Sleep Medicine clinic, between January 2018 and June 2023, were retrospectively analyzed with a follow-up period of one year. Twenty-six clinical and demographic variables were initially extracted and preprocessed using one-hot encoding. After the removal of highly correlated variables, the final dataset comprised 36 features derived from encoded categorical variables. Seven machine learning algorithms, namely Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Gradient Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were trained to predict discharge readiness. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC). Feature importance was assessed using information gain and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret model predictions.
resultsThe Random Forest model demonstrated superior performance in predicting readiness for discharge, with an accuracy of 0.7901, precision of 0.8611, recall of 0.8943, F1 score of 0.7901, and ROC-AUC of 0.6442. SHAP analysis identified onset duration, pain severity, anxiety level, presence of neck pain, and body mass index (BMI) as the most influential predictors.
conclusionsThe identified prognostic factors highlight the multidimensional nature of TMD and support their relevance in guiding patient-specific management strategies. The integration of machine learning approaches may enhance clinical decision-making and contribute to the development of more personalized and effective treatment pathways for TMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.