ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
Assessment of Chemical, Mechanical, and Microscopic Properties of Novel Self-Adhesive Dental Composites.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize and characterize a novel self-adhesive bioactive and antibacterial dental composite with enhanced mechanical properties. Materials and Methods: All components were procured from Sigma Aldrich, United States. Commercially available Filtek Z250 and Nexcomp were used as control groups (C1 and C2, respectively). Four novel dental composite groups (C3, C4, C5, and C6) were prepared by mixing monomer solution and inorganic fillers (silica, chlorhexidine, MCPM, and β-TCP): in varying concentrations. The resulting dental composites were assessed for chemical, mechanical, and microscopic characterizations. Structural analysis and degree of conversion (DC) of prepared samples were evaluated with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), while the microscopic interface was evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Mechanical characterizations included the biaxial flexural strength (BFS) test and the shear bond strength (SBS) test. The obtained data were then analyzed by SPSS version 21.0. Descriptive statistics were used to describe all the values for BFS, SBS, and DC. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey's test were used to compare the mean values. A Results: FTIR results showed a major alteration in DC by calculating the differences in unpolymerized and polymerized aliphatic (1,638 cm Conclusion: The novel C3 dental composite showed high DC and BFS, whereas C4 had higher SBS but lower than C2. Moreover, effective bonding was achieved with C3 novel composite. It is crucial to optimize the monomer-to-filler ratio for the development of durable bioactive self-adhesive composites with antibacterial property.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.