Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41435865›Full record

ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026

Evaluation of automated tooth landmark localization on digital models.

Naeun Kwon, Dong-Yub Ko, Ji-Ae Park, Jong-Hak Kim, Nikolaos Pandis, Shin-Jae Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naeun Kwon
Dong-Yub Ko
Ji-Ae Park
Jong-Hak Kim
Nikolaos Pandis
Shin-Jae Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate agreement between the tooth landmark localization patterns of artificial intelligence (AI) and those from human examiners. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) digital dental model images were obtained from 284 participants. On a total of 5583 permanent teeth, six landmarks per tooth were manually identified and annotated using custom-made 3D annotation software. To develop an AI model capable of automatically identifying tooth landmarks, a deep-learning algorithm was applied to a training dataset consisting of 4519 teeth. To select the optimal AI model, datasets of 556 and 508 teeth were used as validation and test datasets, respectively. For intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability tests, 280 teeth from 10 participants were randomly selected, and two human examiners identified the same six landmarks on two separate occasions. Results: The mean error in tooth landmark localization of the AI model ranged from 0.01 mm to 1.68 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the AI model and human examiner for all landmarks was excellent, ranging from 0.97 to 1.0. The landmark localization error from the AI model was smaller than human interexaminer differences for mesial and distal proximal points. However, errors for the cusp tip and facial axis points were greater in the AI model than the interexaminer differences. Conclusions: AI exhibited localization accuracy for tooth landmarks comparable with that of human examiners for specific measurements related to tooth size. Nonetheless, its accuracy still needs improvement to match that of orthodontic clinicians in identifying cusp tips and facial axis points.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksArtificial IntelligenceImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, DentalToothAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceAutomated identificationDigital dental modelInterexaminer reliabilityIntraexaminer reliabilityTooth landmark

Identifiers

PMID41435865
PMCPMC12962268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.