ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2026
Low population penetrance of variants associated with inherited retinal degenerations.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and penetrance of heritable retinoblastoma in two adult population cohorts: implications for genomic newborn screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Revisiting retinal and macular degeneration in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Clinical and Population-Specific Insights Into Inherited Retinal Dystrophies From Whole-Exome Sequencing of the Polish Cohort.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Structure-Based Network Analysis of AlphaFold Structure Predictions Identifies Putative Causative Variants of Inherited Retinal Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- GenRiskPro: A Comprehensive Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis Platform for Clinical and Wellness Applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are the leading cause of blindness in working-age adults and are thought to be monogenic with near-complete penetrance. However, traditional variant discovery based on phenotypic ascertainment may inflate penetrance estimates and obscure the true genotype-phenotype spectrum. We used large biobanks with linked genomic and clinical data to quantify the population-level penetrance of IRD-associated variants. We screened 317,964 All of Us (AoU) participants for loss-of-function or pathogenic IRD variants to curate a cohort with definite IRD-compatible genotypes. We defined three nested International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 code sets ("IRD," "retinopathy," and "screening") to derive lower- and upper-bound penetrance estimates via disease annotation frequencies (DAFs). Within a cohort of 481 AoU participants with definite IRD-compatible genotypes, DAFs ranged from 9.4% (IRD) to 28.1% (screening), which were enriched relative to the prevalence of the code sets in AoU (p < 0.001). For validation, we examined retinal imaging of UK Biobank (UKB) participants who shared variants with the AoU cohort. In the UKB, 16.1%-27.9% of participants with shared variants exhibited definite or possible IRD features, concordant with AoU estimates. Participant demographics, smoking, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities did not predict penetrance. These results show that the population penetrance of IRD-associated genotypes is markedly lower than traditionally assumed. This suggests that genetic or environmental modifiers are required to manifest disease and that IRD genotypes are more prevalent (0.7%-2.1%) than expected. These findings inform our understanding of the genetic causality of IRDs, impact the clinical use of genetic testing, and have implications for the development of therapies for IRDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.