Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41435693›Full record

ReviewVision research2026

Are we ready to tackle perceptual segmentation of natural scenes?

Ruben Coen-Cagli, Pascal Mamassian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruben Coen-CagliDepartment of Systems Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, 10461 Bronx, NY, United States; Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, 10461 Bronx, NY, United States; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, 10461 Bronx, NY, United States. Electronic address: ruben.coen-cagli@einsteinmed.edu.
Pascal MamassianLaboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, Département d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France.

Funding

SUPPORT FOR THE ROSE F KENNEDY IDDRC P50P50HD105352 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SOPHIE MOLHOLM, Steven Upshaw Walkley · 2021 to 2026
$7.0M
Natural image processing in the visual cortexR01EY030578 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Ruben Coen-Cagli, ADAM KOHN · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
CRCNS: Probabilistic models of perceptual grouping/segmentation in natural vision R01EY031166 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI COEN-CAGLI, RUBEN · 2019 to 2021
$584k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030578NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031166NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processes of perceptual segmentation and integration (PSI) are fundamental to perceptual organization. Although PSI of visual stimuli has been studied for over a century, we have only a rudimentary understanding of PSI of natural visual stimuli. This is due to limitations of traditional experimental methods in visual psychophysics of PSI; to the exclusive focus of computer-vision research for image segmentation on performance benchmarks; and to the scarcity of meaningful interactions between those two communities. The recent literature discussed in this paper presents a compelling argument that the field is starting to overcome those barriers. One important example of such an interaction between visual psychophysics and machine learning is given by the literature on the crowding phenomenon, which calls for revised models of summary statistics to explain some uncrowding results. Other examples reviewed here include studies of the perceptual uncertainty and dynamics of segmentation of natural stimuli, which call for computational models with probabilistic representations and dynamic computations. Conversely, contemporary machine learning algorithms produce impressive segmentation maps that still need to be aligned with human maps as measured with objective tasks such as the same/different segment paradigm reviewed here. Therefore, the time is ripe to move vision science forward by bridging new computational and experimental paradigms for PSI of natural stimuli.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionHumansMachine LearningPsychophysicsAlgorithmsGroupingIntegrationNatural scenesSegmentationUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41435693
PMCPMC12832203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.