Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41435395›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

The Effectiveness of Social Support-Based Interventions for Dietary and Physical Activity in Adults Living With Overweight and Obesity: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Preeyapat Mangkalard, Abigail Fisher, Alexandra Burton, Dhikshita Chandana, Rana Conway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Preeyapat MangkalardResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom, 44 020 7679 1720.ORCID 0000-0003-4069-3641
Abigail FisherResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom, 44 020 7679 1720.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-6780
Alexandra BurtonCentre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4433-3902
Dhikshita ChandanaResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom, 44 020 7679 1720.ORCID 0009-0002-2975-3746
Rana ConwayResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom, 44 020 7679 1720.ORCID 0000-0003-0955-7107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a global public health concern, affecting roughly 1 in 3 individuals. Social support has been identified as a key factor in promoting healthy behaviors, including dietary improvements and increased physical activity. While previous reviews have focused primarily on weight loss outcomes, there is limited evidence on how social support-based interventions specifically influence diet and physical activity behaviors. Objective: This study aims to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of social support-based interventions in improving dietary and physical activity behaviors among adults living with overweight and obesity (plus weight changes and psychosocial factors as secondary outcomes) and (2) identify which types of social support are most effective in facilitating positive behavioral changes. Methods: A comprehensive search will be conducted across 7 databases and registers (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) and gray literature sources (Google Scholar, ProQuest, and PsyArXiv), in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two independent reviewers will screen randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies involving adults living with overweight or obesity who have participated in social support-based interventions targeting diet and physical activity. The revised Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools will be used to assess the risk of bias. Findings will be reported qualitatively, and where appropriate, meta-analyses will be performed to generate pooled effect estimates for the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will also be reported qualitatively. Results: A pilot database search was conducted on November 29, 2024, to refine the search syntax. The screening, data extraction, quality assessment, and analysis will be conducted, with completion expected by March 2026. Conclusions: This review will synthesize current evidence on the effectiveness of social support-based interventions for improving diet and physical activity among adults living with overweight and obesity. The findings will help inform the development of future interventions and contribute to public health strategies.

Indexed as

DietExerciseObesityOverweightSocial SupportAdultHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topicdietinterventionmeta-analysisobesityoverweightphysical activityPRISMAprotocolsocial supportsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41435395
PMCPMC12726821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.