ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
Dynamic Mortality Risk Prediction in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Using Longitudinal Clinical Data.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) exhibit diverse disease trajectories necessitating different clinical approaches ranging from watch-and-wait strategies to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Existing risk scores like the IPSS-R or Endothelial Activation and Stress Index provide static risk stratification at diagnosis but do not capture evolving disease dynamics. We addressed this problem by introducing a dynamic, data-driven approach to repeatedly predict short-term mortality risks, across the patient's disease course. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a machine learning model on the basis of gradient-boosted decision trees to estimate 1-year mortality risks from both longitudinal parameters from blood values and diagnosis-based features. We trained the model on a data set of patients from the MDS Registry Düsseldorf (n = 1,024) and validated it on patients from University Hospitals Heidelberg (n = 286) and Mannheim (n = 31).
resultsValidations on independent cohorts achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve scores of around 0.8 and better predictive performance for 1-year mortality compared with a diagnosis-only baseline model. The model accurately predicted mortality risks as early as within the first 90 days of diagnosis. Feature importance analysis revealed clinically plausible feature-label relations, supporting interpretability. Comparison with the IPSS-R and training on 1-year AML progression revealed the advantages and generalizability of the approach.
conclusionThis dynamic risk model enables continuous, individualized assessment of 1-year mortality risk in patients with MDS, offering a supplement to static scores used at diagnosis. Our results highlight the utility and importance of including longitudinal parameters in risk assessment analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.