Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41435206›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025

Dynamic Mortality Risk Prediction in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Using Longitudinal Clinical Data.

Jonathan Bobak, Philipp Spohr, Sarah Richter, Alexander Streuer, Felicitas Isabel Schulz, Corinna Strupp, Catharina Gerhards, Nanni Schmitt, Thomas Luft, Sascha Dietrich and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jonathan BobakDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-3022-5860
Philipp SpohrChair Algorithmic Bioinformatics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sarah RichterDepartment of Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander StreuerDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3531-534X
Felicitas Isabel SchulzDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Corinna StruppDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Catharina GerhardsInstitute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7197-9242
Nanni SchmittDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3455-9606
Thomas LuftDepartment of Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-1640
Sascha DietrichDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ulrich GermingDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Gunnar W KlauChair Algorithmic Bioinformatics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6340-0090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) exhibit diverse disease trajectories necessitating different clinical approaches ranging from watch-and-wait strategies to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Existing risk scores like the IPSS-R or Endothelial Activation and Stress Index provide static risk stratification at diagnosis but do not capture evolving disease dynamics. We addressed this problem by introducing a dynamic, data-driven approach to repeatedly predict short-term mortality risks, across the patient's disease course. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed a machine learning model on the basis of gradient-boosted decision trees to estimate 1-year mortality risks from both longitudinal parameters from blood values and diagnosis-based features. We trained the model on a data set of patients from the MDS Registry Düsseldorf (n = 1,024) and validated it on patients from University Hospitals Heidelberg (n = 286) and Mannheim (n = 31).

resultsValidations on independent cohorts achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve scores of around 0.8 and better predictive performance for 1-year mortality compared with a diagnosis-only baseline model. The model accurately predicted mortality risks as early as within the first 90 days of diagnosis. Feature importance analysis revealed clinically plausible feature-label relations, supporting interpretability. Comparison with the IPSS-R and training on 1-year AML progression revealed the advantages and generalizability of the approach.

conclusionThis dynamic risk model enables continuous, individualized assessment of 1-year mortality risk in patients with MDS, offering a supplement to static scores used at diagnosis. Our results highlight the utility and importance of including longitudinal parameters in risk assessment analysis.

Indexed as

Myelodysplastic SyndromesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID41435206
PMCPMC12727070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.