ArticlePloS one2025
Construction of an intelligent screening model for allergic rhinitis based on routine blood tests.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in clinical examination techniques for allergic rhinitis: a review from traditional testing to precision diagnosis.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of allergic rhinitis (AR) has been increasing annually, severely impacting patients' quality of life and increasing socioeconomic burdens. The limitations of current diagnostic methods have made the development of efficient, low-cost early screening tools urgent. Based on routine blood test data, this study employed an ensemble hard voting strategy, a comprehensive filtering strategy, an embedding strategy, and a packing strategy to select 16 highly correlated features with a frequency of at least two occurrences as model inputs. Subsequently, the top three machine learning algorithms (K-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, and support vector machine) were selected based on the area under the curve (AUC) metric as the base classifiers. An intelligent early screening model for AR was constructed using an ensemble soft voting strategy. This model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.862, significantly outperforming any single algorithm. Furthermore, the external validation accuracy was 73.91%. These results demonstrate that combining an ensemble voting strategy with machine learning methods can effectively construct an early screening model for AR based on routine blood test parameters without adding additional burden to patients, providing a new approach to improving diagnosis and treatment in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.