Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41433277›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Assessing Methane Emissions from Shale Gas Production in China: A Two-Tiered Mobile Measurement Approach.

Pu Hong, Yuzhong Zhang, Wenrui Shi, Shuang Zhao, Xin Feng, Minghao Zhuang, Xi Lu, Meiyu Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pu HongDepartment of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4939-2116
Yuzhong ZhangKey Laboratory of Coastal Environment and Resources of Zhejiang Province, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5431-5022
Wenrui ShiDepartment of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China.
Shuang ZhaoKey Laboratory of Coastal Environment and Resources of Zhejiang Province, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-8056
Xin FengKey Laboratory of Coastal Environment and Resources of Zhejiang Province, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China.
Minghao ZhuangCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, National Academy of Agriculture Green Development, Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xi LuState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5063-3776
Meiyu GuoDepartment of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7379-6666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China, holding the world's largest shale gas reserves, lacks precise data on methane emissions from its rapidly expanding production. We introduce a two-tiered mobile measurement approach, using a mobile laboratory to measure methane concentrations across 125 well pads (approximately 750 wells) distributed among four major production blocks (Changning, Weiyuan, Fuling, and Luzhou). These blocks contributed 84% of China's total shale gas production in 2023, providing the first comprehensive ground-level measurements. Stationary downwind monitoring of well pads revealed emission rates from 0.002 to 98.86 kg/h, validated through mobile observations of methane concentrations across the region. Notably, emissions were highly concentrated, with 89% originating from just 10% of the well pads. For 2023, the extrapolated methane emissions from China's shale gas production were estimated at 16,842 t (6,444-29,991 t, 95% CI), corresponding to a methane leakage rate of 0.10% (0.04%-0.17%, 95% CI). This rate is lower than major U.S. fields and similar to that of U.S. dry gas fields. Our research identifies gas lift venting, incomplete combustion from compressors, and process venting as significant sources of super-emissions in China's shale gas upstream production chain. The methodology employed, based on comprehensive and targeted field measurements, demonstrates its effectiveness in providing a scientific basis for formulating precise and effective regulatory policies on methane emissions.

Indexed as

MethaneNatural GasAir PollutantsChinaEnvironmental MonitoringOil and Gas FieldsAir PollutantsMethaneNatural Gasmethane emissionpoint source Gaussian methodshale gasSTILT

Identifiers

PMID41433277
PMCPMC12810235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.