Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41433271›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

A process evaluation of an eHealth intervention to strengthen the circle of tuberculosis care in Shigatse, Tibet, China.

Victoria Haldane, Zhitong Zhang, Tingting Yin, Bei Zhang, Yinlong Li, Qiuyu Pan, Katie N Dainty, Elizabeth Rea, Pande Pasang, Jun Hu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victoria HaldaneInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zhitong ZhangDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tingting YinWeifang Medical College, Weifang, China.
Bei ZhangWeifang Medical College, Weifang, China.
Yinlong LiJining Medical University, Jining, China.
Qiuyu PanNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1592-1198
Katie N DaintyInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth ReaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pande PasangShigatse Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigatse, China.
Jun HuShigatse Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigatse, China.
Xiaolin WeiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-2650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is an ongoing global health threat that has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. People with TB need comprehensive medical and social supports to ensure they can maintain and complete TB treatment. TB programs globally have turned to eHealth to bridge gaps in access and strengthen the circle of care around people with TB. This study evaluates the implementation of an intervention aimed at improving TB care in Shigatse, using the CFIR framework to identify factors influencing its success. The intervention included the use of e-Monitor boxes and WeChat for patient engagement. Data were collected through interviews with patients, treatment supporters, and health workers. Key challenges identified included inadequate infrastructure, digital literacy barriers, and unclear roles due to recent TB service delivery reforms. Enablers included strong social structures, proximity to village doctors, and government support for free TB treatment. Results showed that while older patients faced difficulties with digital tools, younger family members often assisted, enhancing engagement. Health workers' training and the timing of training sessions were critical to the intervention's success. The study concludes that despite challenges, the intervention was generally well-received and effective, with recommendations for ongoing training and adaptation to local contexts.

Identifiers

PMID41433271
PMCPMC12725529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.