Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41433270›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhancing mathematical modeling competencies through AI-powered VR.

Nejla Gürefe, Hava Öksüz, Gülfem Sarpkaya Aktaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nejla GürefeFaculty of Education, Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0705-0890
Hava ÖksüzFaculty of Education, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.
Gülfem Sarpkaya AktaşFaculty of Education, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving students' problem-solving skills is one of the primary objectives of mathematics education. Problem-solving skills are closely related to the mathematical modeling process and the competencies required in this process, which are essential in various aspects of daily life.

methodThe study was designed as a mixed design. A quasi-experimental design to examine the impact of an instructional model based on an artificial intelligence-supported virtual reality (VR) application on students' modeling competencies for quantitative data and opinion and observation forms were used for qualitative data. These competencies included inductive, deductive, pragmatic, planned, and problem-solving thinking. The study involved 30 students from two 6th-grade classes at a Science and Art Center located in the western part of Turkey. One class served as the experimental group (f = 15) and engaged with the AI-pVR approach, while the other class served as the control group (f = 15) and followed the traditional teaching model. In the study, independent samples t-tests and ANCOVA were performed for quantitative analysis, and to check ANCOVA assumptions, normality, homogeneity of variances, linearity, and homogeneity of regression slopes were examined. Descriptive analysis was also performed for qualitative analysis.

resultsThe findings of this study revealed that the intervention had a significant large effect (η² = 0.37) on students' mathematical modeling competencies. Among the components of modeling competence, understanding and simplifying the problem, mathematizing, working mathematically, interpreting, and verifying all exhibited significant large effects (η² = 0.33, 0.19, 0.32, 0.39, respectively), while defining the problem showed a moderate effect (η² = 0.15). The variability observed in some measurements may be attributed to limitations in the number of practice trials and the small sample size. However, the educational process carried out within the scope of this study has shown that students have made significant progress in their mathematical modeling skills. Students have stated that they have meaningfully grasped the basic steps of the modeling process, such as analyzing real-life problems, relating these problems to mathematical structures, creating models, solving the model they have created step by step, interpreting and verifying the results. In addition, students have developed a significant awareness in sharing their models with their friends and teachers, receiving meaningful feedback, developing new models for different life situations, and establishing connections between real life and mathematics.

conclusionThe results indicated that the integration of the AI-pVR instructional approach significantly improved students' modeling competencies and related sub-dimensions. These sub-dimensions were problem understanding and simplification, mathematizing, working mathematically, interpreting, and verifying. Based on these findings, it is recommended that artificial intelligence applications, which can positively influence various areas such as competencies, should be incorporated into teachers' lessons and even included in curriculum programs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMathematicsModels, TheoreticalVirtual RealityChildFemaleHumansMaleProblem SolvingStudents

Identifiers

PMID41433270
PMCPMC12725721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.