Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41433261›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Deer impact seedbanks and plant communities over 18 years of post-agricultural succession.

A Sophie Westbrook, Aleah Butler-Jones, Scott H Morris, Max Goldman, Anurag Agrawal, Antonio DiTommaso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A Sophie WestbrookDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Aleah Butler-JonesSection of Horticulture, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, New York, United States of America.
Scott H MorrisSection of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Max GoldmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Anurag AgrawalDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Antonio DiTommasoSection of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are known to alter the composition of plant communities and the course of secondary succession. We present 18 years of data from a long-term deer exclosure experiment near Ithaca, NY, USA, to evaluate seedbank dynamics and the resulting aboveground community. Seedbank data were collected annually from 2005 to 2021 through a germination assay in which 280,674 emerged seedlings were identified. Aboveground data were collected from 2019 to 2022. Across all years, deer increased Shannon-Wiener diversity of seeds germinated from the soil by 8% relative to exclosure plots but did not affect abundance or species richness. Deer altered seedbank composition but not the percentage of biennial/perennial (vs. annual) or native (vs. non-native) species in the seedbank. Deer had little effect on aboveground plant communities (total cover, diversity, percentage biennial/perennial, percentage native) in 2019 or 2022. Nonetheless, deer reduced the abundance of woody plants by 50% and only the exclosure treatment had trees exceeding 1 cm diameter at breast height after 16 years. Although seedbank and aboveground plant communities changed over the study period, there was generally no interaction between the effects of exclosure treatment and year. Overall, our findings show that deer increased seedbank diversity, altered seedbank community composition, and suppressed woody plants aboveground. These changes are likely to impact the process of secondary succession. Increased seedbank diversity might increase the feasibility of passive restoration, whereas suppression of woody plants would delay forest recovery.

Indexed as

AgricultureDeerPlantsSeed BankSeedsAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID41433261
PMCPMC12725539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.