ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Corrected and republished from: "Clinical validation of an RSV neutralization assay and analysis of cross-sectional sera associated with 2021-2023 RSV outbreaks to investigate the immunity debt hypothesis".
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory infections and hospitalization in infants and the elderly. Newly approved vaccines and the prophylactic antibody nirsevimab have heightened interest in RSV immunologic surveillance, necessitating the development of high-throughput assays assessing anti-RSV neutralizing activity. Quantitative viral neutralization remains the best correlate of protection for RSV infection and the gold standard for RSV immunological testing. Here, we developed a high-throughput RSV strain A2 focus-reduction neutralization test validated to CLIA/GCLP standards using both clinical specimens and commercially available reference sera. The assay is highly accurate, generating reference serum neutralizing titers within twofold of established assays, with an analytical measurement range between 8 and 1,798 international units (IU) per mL. Neutralizing activity measured by the assay strongly correlated with antibody titer determined via indirect ELISA ( IMPORTANCE: Population surveillance studies of serum neutralizing activity against RSV are crucial for evaluating RSV vaccine efficacy and vulnerabilities to new strains. Here, we designed and validated a high-throughput assay for assessing anti-RSV neutralizing activity, standardized its measurements for comparison with other methodologies, and demonstrated its applicability to real-world samples. Our assay is precise, linear, and yields measurements consistent with other standardized assays, offering a methodology useful for large-scale studies of RSV immunity. We also find no significant difference in neutralizing titers among adults between taken before and after large RSV outbreaks associated with the latter stages of the COVID-19 public health emergency, underlining the need for a greater understanding of the dynamics of serological responses to RSV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.