ArticleEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports2025
A potentially dangerous case of mistaken identity: giant asymptomatic composite phaeochromocytoma.
Article in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Summary: Small clinically silent phaeochromocytoma (PCC) can be identified in modern clinical practice as apparent adrenal incidentaloma or during screening of patients with familial tumour syndromes. Composite tumours comprising both PCC and a second tissue sharing embryological origin from the neural crest are rare, with fewer than 140 cases described in the literature. We report a 62-year-old woman with a 15 cm adrenal mass that was incidentally discovered on pulmonary imaging. A second 7 cm pelvic mass was also identified. The patient had no symptoms of catecholamine excess and normal blood pressure, even during a biopsy of the adrenal mass. Concordantly, urinary catecholamines were normal; however, urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine excretion were 23-fold and nine-fold the upper limit of normal, respectively. Surgical resection resulted in normalisation of metanephrines and normetanephrines. Histopathology showed a composite PCC/ganglioneuroma with discrete areas of both tumours within the same mass. Later resection of the pelvic mass revealed an unrelated ovarian teratoma. This case demonstrates a novel presentation of a composite PCC/ganglioneuroma and the presumptive role of catechol-O-methyltransferase in inactivating catecholamines within PCC, resulting in undetected growth of the tumour to a giant size. It highlights that metanephrines and normetanephrines are the preferred investigation for PCC. Learning points: Clinically silent PCC are increasingly common but are typically small, with relatively low levels of metanephrines. Upregulation of COMT causes intratumoural inactivation of catecholamines and may facilitate asymptomatic growth of PCC to a giant size. Measurement of metanephrine and normetanephrine levels in plasma or urine is the preferred biochemical investigation for PCC. Composite PCC are rare but have a similar clinical presentation and management to other PCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.