Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41433191›Full record

ArticleCancer science2026

Label Noise in Pathological Segmentation Is Overlooked, Leading to Potential Overestimation of Artificial Intelligence.

Kenji Harada, Yuichiro Nomura, Daisuke Komura, Shumpei Ishikawa, Shingo Sakashita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenji HaradaSchool of Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-2846
Yuichiro NomuraDivision of Computer Science, College of Informatics, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Daisuke KomuraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0038-728X
Shumpei IshikawaDivision of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
Shingo SakashitaDivision of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1133-3313

Funding

JST SPRING JPMJSP2132National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 2024-A-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed medical imaging, notably in radiology and endoscopy. Semantic segmentation, a pixel-level technique crucial for delineating pathological features, has become pivotal in digital pathology. Pathology segmentation AI models are often trained using annotations generated by pathologists. Despite the meticulous care typically exercised, pathologist-generated annotations often contain label noise whose types and effects on model training remain underexplored. This study combined a survey of public datasets with the synthesis of artificial label noise to evaluate its effects on pathology segmentation models. Using publicly available datasets and a breast cancer semantic segmentation dataset, modules were developed to simulate four types of artificial label noise at varying intensity levels. These datasets were used to train deep learning models and their performance was evaluated. The results indicated that models were highly susceptible to overfitting label noise, particularly boundary-dependent noise, such as dilation and shrinkage. Discrepancies were identified between apparent performance scores obtained under real-world conditions and true performance scores derived using clean test data. This overestimation risk was most pronounced for datasets containing boundary-altering noise. Furthermore, random noise combinations further degraded generalization. This study underscores the critical importance of addressing label noise in pathology datasets. It is proposed that future efforts focus on developing standardized methods for quantifying and mitigating label noise, along with creating robust benchmarks using noise-inclusive datasets. Enhancing annotation quality and addressing label noise can improve the reliability and generalizability of AI in pathology, facilitating broader clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningFemaleHumansannotationdeep learningdigital pathologylabel noisesegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41433191
PMCPMC12951102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.