ArticleInternational journal of audiology2025
Interventions to prevent noise-induced hearing loss in farmworkers: a scoping review.
Article in International journal of audiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hearing Loss Prevention Training for Spanish-Speaking Farmworkers: Protocol for a Community-Engaged Hybrid Type 1 Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFarmworkers are at increased risk for noise-induced hearing loss. This scoping review aimed to summarise the evidence on interventions to prevent NIHL among farmworkers and to identify gaps and priorities for future research.
methodsThe review followed Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
resultsTwenty-three studies published between 1999 and 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Most (88%) were conducted in the United States. The majority employed educational strategies targeting intent to use hearing protection or self-reported use. Although educational approaches were generally effective, interventions that increased access to hearing protection were linked to higher self-reported use. Nearly half of the studies (n = 11) focused solely on individual-level outcomes.
conclusionsAlthough most existing NIHL prevention efforts have focused on education, structural approaches appear more promising for sustainable impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.