ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Performance and Wellbeing Research Priorities in Premiership Women's Rugby: A Delphi Study Including Players and Staff.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women's sport has seen substantial growth in recent years, with increased attention to athlete performance and welfare. To support the ongoing professionalisation of women's rugby, performance and wellbeing must be prioritised. This study used a three-round Delphi-process to establish performance and wellbeing research priorities for Premiership Women's Rugby (PWR) in England. In Round 1, players and staff provided research priorities, which were grouped into higher-order categories and themes via content analysis. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants ranked higher-order categories on a 1-5 Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Seventy-seven participants responded in Round 1 (47 and 43 in Rounds 2 and 3). Player and staff experience of playing or working in PWR was 5.0 (2.0-7.0) and 2.5 (2.0-4.0) years. Following Round 1321 research priorities were provided, 32 higher-order research priorities and 14 categories were identified, within three themes: performance, wellbeing and injury. Following Round 3, nine research priorities reached consensus within performance (n = 1), wellbeing (n = 4) and injury (n = 4). The highest rated priority was 'Investigate the impact of being a dual-career athlete on wellbeing, and any support mechanisms required' (79%). Future research should prioritise studies which are feasible and currently lack a comprehensive evidence-base. This will enable researchers and governing bodies to address relevant knowledge gaps and inform ongoing performance and player safety initiatives. The research priorities identified in this study, by PWR players and staff, could be investigated to support the development of women's rugby domestically. These findings may also be applicable to other women's sports and leagues globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.