SynthesisJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2026
The effectiveness of protein supplements on athletic performance and post-exercise recovery - a Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein supplements are a popular category of dietary supplements among fitness enthusiasts and athletes. However, research providing definitive conclusions on the effects of protein on athletic performance and post-exercise recovery remains limited. Key factors, such as protein source, timing, and optimal dosage, require further investigation to clarify their impact.
methodA systematic search across seven databases identified 6,129 studies, which were screened using the Covidence online tool. After independent selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment by two reviewers, 75 studies involving 1,206 athletes were included in the meta-analysis. A multilevel meta-analysis synthesized data from the included studies using a Bayesian hierarchical model with the brms package. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot generated with the PublicationBias package and by calculating the P value of Egger's test through the metafor package. Additionally, a moderation analysis with the brms package was conducted to examine the relationship between seven moderators and effect sizes.
resultsThe results demonstrated that the effects of protein-carbohydrate supplements showed statistical significance in comparison to the placebo group [μ(SMD): 0.57, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.93] in enhancing endurance performance. Pure protein supplements demonstrated statistically significant effects compared to the placebo group in both endurance performance [μ(SMD): 0.37, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.71] and muscle strength [μ(SMD): 0.72, 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.27]. For post-exercise recovery, pure protein supplements also showed statistically significant effects compared to carbohydrate supplements for maintaining glycogen resynthesis [μ(SMD): 0.83, 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.46]. However, the results indicated that all significant effects were observed in randomized controlled trials where the energy intake between the intervention and control groups was not matched.
conclusionThe effects of protein supplementation on athletic performance and post-exercise recovery appear to be limited. Protein supplements showed beneficial effects compared to no supplementation. However, all statistically significant results were derived from studies in which energy intake was not matched between groups. This suggests that the observed benefits may not be attributable to protein per se. An additional intake of 1 g/kg/day of protein from supplements, resulting in a total daily protein intake of approximately 2 g/kg/day, appears to be most effective for enhancing athletic performance. REGISTRATION: Registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (identification code CRD42024608194).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.