ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
Defining an optimal cut-off for subscales without a gold standard: a novel method using inflection points of latent attribute probabilities and raw scores.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study introduces Inf.P, a novel method for determining optimal cut-off points using the inflection point approach in the absence of a gold standard. It models the nonlinear relationship between raw scores and latent class probabilities with a cubic polynomial function, offering a data-driven boundary that reflects the underlying latent structure. Inf.P enhances diagnostic precision of scale-based assessments by providing more accurate thresholds for distinguishing different levels of latent attributes.
methodsTo evaluate the Inf.P, high- and low-attribute groups were created for benchmarking. The method was compared to the traditional Youden Index through a comprehensive simulation study, exploring variations in sample sizes and item numbers. Real-world data were also employed to assess its applicability. Performance was assessed using accuracy, bias, and mean squared error (MSE).
resultsThe Inf.P method demonstrated lower bias and MSE compared to the Youden Index, especially when specificity was prioritized. Both methods yielded similar accuracy in larger samples, but Inf.P provided more reliable cut-off points. In smaller samples, the difference between estimated cut-off points increased with the number of items but decreased in larger samples. These findings suggest that studies with small sample sizes should consider limiting the number of items to maintain optimal cut-off precision.
conclusionInf.P offers a robust and reliable approach for defining optimal cut-off in scale-based assessments of complex latent traits, supported by real data, with an interactive web tool available for practical use ( https://spapp.shinyapps.io/InfPcutoff/ ). It promises to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making, particularly in the assessment of psychological and neurological disorders, as well as in determination of quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41433005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.