ArticleMaternal and child health journal2026
Perceived Importance of Obstetric Quality Measures to Veterans Receiving Community-Based Obstetric Care.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRacial and ethnic disparities in obstetric care persist in the United States. Veterans enrolled in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care receive obstetric care from community providers enrolled in the VA Community Care Network (CCN), yet little is known about Veterans' prenatal care decision-making. This study described how Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) Veterans select prenatal care providers and perceive hospital-level obstetric quality measures.
methodsPregnant BIPOC Veterans (n = 27) were identified from a community-based doula pilot (N = 29) at two VA medical centers. During semi-structured telephone surveys conducted around 20 weeks gestation, Veterans described factors influencing provider selection and rated the importance of three Joint Commission obstetric quality measures-cesarean birth, unexpected complications in term newborns, and exclusive breast milk feeding-on a 3-point scale ("not," "somewhat," or "very" important). Open-ended responses contextualized these ratings, and participants were asked if they knew how to access hospital-level quality data.
resultsParticipants (mean age = 33 years) were predominantly Black (85.2%) and multiparous (70.4%). Provider selection was most influenced by geographic proximity (48.2%) and VA insurance coverage (44.4%). Hospital-level unexpected complications in term newborns was rated "very important" by 66.7%, followed by cesarean birth (48.1%) and exclusive breast milk feeding (40.7%). Most Veterans valued measures perceived as related to infant well-being. However, 74.1% did not know how to access quality data. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: BIPOC Veterans valued hospital-level obstetric quality measures related to infant outcomes and prioritized geographic accessibility and insurance coverage when selecting providers. Relevant, accessible quality information may allow Veterans to make better informed prenatal care decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41432974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.