ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
The Asian Oceanian Society of Radiology (AOSR) green radiology survey: a catalyst for action.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Green MRI for neuroimaging: monitoring brain tumors using non-contrast sequences.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Green radiology (part 1): environmental sustainability and energy consumption in medical imaging, with perspectives from Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 5% and 1% of global greenhouse gas emissions originate from the healthcare sector and medical imaging respectively. These are not insignificant. Despite this, the medical field has been slow to adopt sustainable practices. Green radiology is a sustainable, innovative, and responsible approach in radiological practice that focuses on minimising the negative environmental impact of our technologies and procedures. The Asian Oceanian Society of Radiology (AOSR) conducted a survey across Asia-Oceania to better understand current operations and identify opportunities for meaningful progress toward more sustainable radiological practices. From the 123 institutions that responded, it was found that collectively the carbon footprint of Asia-Oceania's radiological services are high in some of the countries/regions because of the high density of high energy consumption scanners (such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scanners). Our survey showed that less than half of the 15 societies that responded had specific academic or research activities related to sustainable radiology and less than a third reported that sustainability had been incorporated in the training curriculum. The AOSR is committed to facilitating the sharing of best practices in green radiology and recommends that Asia-Oceania use an "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" principle, traditionally used in radiation safety and extend this in the approach to the issues of environmental impact of radiological services. The AOSR as a cross-regional professional society, has the mandate to partner with our counterpart societies and industry stakeholders, to emphasise the importance of sustainability as a critical agenda, through our various activities. We foresee that influencing radiology leaders in the region to urgently formulate strategies, implement policies towards adopting eco-friendly approaches including reducing inappropriate imaging and encouraging academic efforts will help to reduce the environmental impact in each country/region. A checklist has been included to help kickstart the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.