ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Evolutionary baggage: paleoanthropological clues in neurology.
Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paleoanthropology could offer valuable insights into neurology by tracing the evolutionary origins of human motor and neural traits. Fossil evidence shows that bipedalism preceded brain expansion, revealing that upright locomotion and encephalization did not evolve in tandem. Early hominins retained ape-like brain organization despite walking upright, suggesting that neural complexity and prolonged childhood development emerged later. This sequence provides a framework for understanding persistent motor circuits in the human nervous system. Central pattern generators, deeply conserved networks producing rhythmic movements, exemplify ancestral continuities whose resilience explains the re-emergence of primitive motor patterns after cortical damage. Interpreting neurological signs through an evolutionary lens raises epistemological challenges, including the need for testable hypotheses and the avoidance of teleological bias. Yet clinically, reframing neurological signs, reflexes, and automatisms as evolutionary echoes could enrich diagnostic reasoning, inform prognosis, and inspire therapeutic strategies that harness ancestral circuits. In this sense, certain neurological signs may represent living traces of evolutionary history, bridging human ancestry with clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41432954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.