ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Baseline Anticholinergic Medication Burden in Patients with Overactive Bladder.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective of this study is to quantify baseline Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scores among women presenting to a urogynecology practice with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and to examine patient characteristics associated with higher baseline ACB scores.
methodsThis retrospective study included women 18 years of age and older presenting as a new patient for evaluation of OAB at an academic urogynecology practice in 2022. A total of 242 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patient baseline characteristics, including medications, were abstracted from the electronic medical record. ACB scores were assessed using a validated four-point scale. OAB treatment after the initial visit was also abstracted.
resultsThe median ACB score was 1, with 37% of patients having a high-risk ACB score (≥3). Anticholinergics were prescribed to 3% of patients, with 71% of these having high-risk baseline ACB scores. Beta-3 agonists were prescribed to 15%, with 46% of these having high-risk baseline scores. Forty-three percent of patients prescribed beta-3 agonists did not initiate therapy owing to cost. High-risk ACB scores were associated with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, anxiety, and depression. Patients with high-risk ACB scores were more likely to receive sacral neuromodulation.
conclusionsMany women with OAB have high-risk baseline ACB scores. Although anticholinergics remain commonly prescribed, their cognitive risks necessitate careful patient assessment. Increasing use of safer alternatives such as beta-3 agonists and addressing cost barriers can improve OAB management. Future research should focus on reducing anticholinergic use and addressing inequity in treatment access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41432906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.