ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025
PARP7 and aryl hydrocarbon receptor differentially regulate mammary cancer cell proliferation and STING-induced type I interferon signalling.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADP-ribosylation: An emerging regulator of the epigenome.Molecular oncology · 2026Review
- Aryl hydrocarbon receptor pharmacology-mechanisms, ligands, and therapeutic potential.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePARP7 is a negative regulator of type I interferon (IFN-I) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signalling and has important roles in cell proliferation and antitumor immunity. Recently, several cancer cell lines have been reported to be sensitive to the antiproliferative effect of PARP7 inhibition by RBN2397; however, the roles of AHR and IFN-I signalling in this effect are not fully understood.
methodsMurine mammary cancer cells were treated with AHR ligands, RBN2397 and with the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist, DMXAA. The impact of ligand treatments on AHR and IFN-I signalling and cell proliferation was determined.
resultsRBN2397 enhanced AHR ligand signalling and STING-induced IFN-I responses in both cell lines. Py8119 but not Py230, 4T1 or EO771 cells were sensitive to the antiproliferative effects of RBN2397. In agreement with FOS-related antigen 1 (FOSL1) being required for sensitivity to RBN2397, Py8119 but not Py230 cells expressed FOSL1. However, RBN2397 insensitive 4T1 and EO771 cell lines also expressed FOSL1, suggesting that the role of FOSL1 in RBN2397-mediated growth inhibition exhibits cell line specificity. In Py8119 cells, RBN2397 induced apoptosis which was independent of AHR ligand treatment and DMXAA-induced STING activation. Although Py230 cells were resistant to the antiproliferative effects RBN2397 alone, combined treatment of DMXAA with RBN2397 reduced their proliferation, which was further reduced by AHR loss or its inhibition.
conclusionThese findings highlight the complexity of the interplay among PARP7, AHR and STING-induced IFN signalling in regulating cancer cell proliferation but also suggest that for some cell lines STING activation might increase their sensitivity to the anti-proliferative effects of RBN2397.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.