ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Predictors of postoperative gustatory disturbance and gustatory recovery following microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGustatory dysfunction is a complication of vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and a frequent patient concern, but there is comparatively little in the literature on this topic to guide surgeons in counseling. In this study, we aimed to identify factors contributing to postoperative gustatory dysfunction and subsequent recovery.
methodsWe included consecutive VS patients who underwent microsurgical resection between July 2016 and April 2024 at our institution. Preoperative data included patient demographic information, tumor characteristics, facial nerve function (classified by House-Brackmann (HB) grade), and the presence of gustatory disturbance. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine independent predictors of postoperative gustatory disturbance. Cox regression analysis was used to determine predictors of taste recovery.
resultsThe study sample included 433 VS patients who underwent microsurgical resection, of whom 89 (20.6%) reported gustatory disturbance at a median of 32 days postoperatively. Older age, preoperative gustatory disturbance, and mild-to-moderate facial nerve injury (HB grade II or III) at discharge were significantly associated with postoperative gustatory disturbance. By the end of the follow-up period, 71.9% of affected patients had recovered gustatory function at a median time of six months since symptom onset. Older age, particularly > 57 years, was significantly associated with a higher risk of prolonged gustatory disturbance.
conclusionPartial as opposed to complete facial nerve injury may be a stronger predictor of postoperative gustatory disturbance. Patients should be counseled that this complication is typically self-resolving; however, older patients may be at increased risk for prolonged gustatory dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41432858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.