Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41432851›Full record

ArticleBiological trace element research2026

Tissue-Specific Trace Element Distribution in Wild Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) from Dovrefjell, Norway.

Rachel M Winter, Floris M van Beest, Niels Martin Schmidt, Sophia V Hansson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel M WinterCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement, Université de Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5300, IRD, Toulouse INP, Avenue de l'Agrobiopole, Toulouse, 31326, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9970-1450
Floris M van BeestDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-4927
Niels Martin SchmidtDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-6218
Sophia V HanssonCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement, Université de Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5300, IRD, Toulouse INP, Avenue de l'Agrobiopole, Toulouse, 31326, France. sophia.hansson@toulouse-inp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5874-0720

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE34-0001 ATCAF-project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trace element analysis of animal tissues has proven to be an effective tool for monitoring biotic health but such methods often rely on invasive sampling. Further, the within body distribution of trace elements, the ionome, -within many species remains poorly understood. Using samples from muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus; n = 14) culled in Dovrefjell, Norway, we analyzed essential (Cu, Zn, Se, Mo) and non-essential (As, Cd, Ba, Pb) trace element concentrations across eight tissues to map their internal distribution. We quantified concentrations via TQ-ICP-MS and used multivariate analyses (PCA, PERMANOVA) and correlation tests to assess whether wool can reliably reflect internal trace element concentrations, thus potentially serve as a non-invasive biomonitoring tool. While the selected elements were detectable across all tissues, each element showed distinct distribution patterns with low correlations between tissues. Generally, feces effectively eliminated most non-essential elements (As, Ba, Pb), while Cd accumulated in kidneys. Essential element patterns were more variable and inconsistent across individuals, likely influenced by physiological and demographic factors (age, sex, pregnancy status). Element concentrations in wool showed weak, but not statistically significant, correlations with those in internal tissues. Our findings - albeit based on a small sample-set - thus suggest that while wool may capture certain element profiles, it does not consistently mirror internal tissue concentrations. This highlights the continued need for multi-tissue approaches in ionomic profiling and emphasizes the importance of considering geographical-, population- and individual-level variability in trace element studies conducted in a wildlife health context. Further research is thus needed to fully validate wool as a reliable, standalone, non-invasive monitoring tool for wildlife health.

Indexed as

RuminantsTrace ElementsAnimalsFecesFemaleMaleNorwayTissue DistributionWoolTrace ElementsBiomonitoringIonomicsQiviutScandinaviaUngulatesWildlife health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.