Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41432812›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2025

Hierarchical Storage Management in User Space for Neuroimaging Applications.

Valérie Hayot-Sasson, Tristan Glatard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Valérie Hayot-SassonDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Tristan GlatardDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. tristan.glatard@concordia.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging open-data initiatives have led to increased availability of large scientific datasets. While these datasets are shifting the processing bottleneck from compute-intensive to data-intensive, current standardized analysis tools have yet to adopt strategies that mitigate the costs associated with large data transfers. A major challenge in adapting neuroimaging applications for data-intensive processing is that they must be entirely rewritten. To facilitate data management for standardized neuroimaging tools, we developed Sea, a library that intercepts and redirects application read and write calls to minimize data transfer time. In this paper, we investigate the performance of Sea on three preprocessing pipelines applied to three different neuroimaging datasets on two high-performance computing clusters. Our results demonstrate that Sea provides large speedups (up to 32×) when the shared file system's performance is deteriorated. When the shared file system is not overburdened by other users, performance is unaffected by Sea, suggesting that Sea's overhead is minimal even in cases where its benefits are limited.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInformation Storage and RetrievalNeuroimagingHumansSoftwareData managementHigh-performance computingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.