ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
HERC5, IFI6, IFIT3, and OASL as potential diagnostic biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated bioinformatics, machine learning and clinical validation.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of Genetic Diagnostic Markers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Genetics research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a life-threatening autoimmune disorder causing multi-organ damage. Current diagnostic methods are hindered by inadequate sensitivity and specificity of conventional biomarkers, which frequently delay diagnosis. Therefore, identifying reliable diagnostic biomarkers for SLE remains critically needed.
methodsSLE microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus were preprocessed. Potential SLE diagnostic biomarkers were identified through differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, and machine learning feature selection. Diagnostic models were constructed based on the candidate genes, optimized with nine machine learning algorithms. The expression levels of the candidate genes were further validated in clinical samples using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), with their clinical relevance assessed statistically.
resultsFour candidate genes-HECT and RLD Domain Containing E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase 5 (HERC5), Interferon Alpha Inducible Protein 6 (IFI6), Interferon Inducible Protein with Tetratricopeptide Repeats 3 (IFIT3), and 2'-5'-Oligoadenylate Synthetase Like (OASL)-showed potential as SLE diagnostic biomarkers, with significantly higher expression in SLE patients versus controls. Individual receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the candidate genes showed area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.8 (P < 0.001), while nomogram model achieved superior accuracy (AUC = 0.905, P < 0.001). Optimized diagnostic models demonstrated robust performance in different datasets (AUC > 0.85, P < 0.001), specifically distinguishing SLE from hepatitis C, multiple sclerosis, and tuberculosis. Clinical validation confirmed these findings, with the gene combination outperforming conventional biomarkers in assessing disease activity (AUC = 0.776, P < 0.001).
conclusionsHERC5, IFI6, IFIT3, and OASL can serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for SLE. The combination of candidate genes demonstrates both differential diagnosis capability and quantitative assessment of disease activity. Key Points • This study integrated bioinformatics and machine learning to screen and identify four candidate genes HERC5, IFI6, IFIT3, and OASL as potential diagnostic biomarkers for SLE.. • Machine learning-optimized diagnostic models based on HERC5, IFI6, IFIT3, and OASL demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance and discriminative capability. • The expression levels and diagnostic potential of HERC5, IFI6, IFIT3, and OASL were further validated using clinical samples, and the results aligned with the findings of the bioinformatics analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41432807What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.