Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41432802›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2025

Drink quickly. Mycorrhizal roots deplete water faster from wet soil.

David Püschel, Jana Rydlová, Radka Sudová, Jan Jansa, Michael Bitterlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David PüschelDepartment of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic. david.puschel@ibot.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-3242
Jana RydlováDepartment of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0631-5762
Radka SudováDepartment of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, Průhonice, 252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-1839
Jan JansaLaboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 00, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0331-1774
Michael BitterlichAlbrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Division Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Lentzeallee 55/57, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-7327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to identify whether mycorrhizal (M) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) plants differed in their rates of water depletion from soil, which was initially very wet but became moderately dry over time. In a greenhouse pot experiment, dwarf-tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum ‘Micro Tom’) were grown in a sterilized substrate. The M plants were inoculated with an isolate of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Funneliformis mosseae ‘BEG95’. Moisture meters permanently installed in each pot recorded soil gravimetric water content (GWC) and allowed controlling soil moisture by pot-specific watering. Water depletion was quantified from these GWC data. We found that immediately after water application calculated to establish 17% GWC in each pot, M plants depleted water faster than did their NM counterparts, resulting in less residual substrate water in M as compared to NM pots. The difference in residual substrate GWC remained significant throughout the entire monitoring period of 44 h, with the mean value of the difference being 0.62% of GWC. The plants in the two treatments differed neither in shoot biomass nor leaf area nor root biomass. The M plants, however, had significantly shorter and thicker roots, whereas NM plants had longer, thinner roots. In line with the expectation that thicker roots exhibit higher hydraulic conductivity, we attribute the faster water depletion in M pots to enhanced ability of mycorrhizal roots to exploit wet substrates, where water availability did not constrain uptake. At later stages, both M and NM plants depleted water at similar rates.

Indexed as

GlomeromycotaMycorrhizaePlant RootsSoilSolanum lycopersicumWaterFungiSoil MicrobiologySoilWaterArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiPlant water depletionRoot morphologySand–zeolite–soil mixtureSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID41432802
PMCPMC12727761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.