ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Prevalence, risk factors and mortality associated with colonic atresia: a population-based case-control study.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital Colonic Stenosis in a Preterm Infant: A Diagnostic Trap and the Potential Masking Effect of a Liquid Diet.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Atresia of the Transverse Colon (Grosfeld Type IIIa) Diagnosed at Seven Days of Life: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to explore maternal and pregnancy-related risk factors for colonic atresia (CA) and assess the national total prevalence, mortality, and frequency of co-occurring anomalies of this rare malformation in 2004-2017.
methodsThis case-control study involved 36 cases with congenital CA identified from several Finnish registers. All cases were identified based on the ICD-9/ICD-10 codes and classified based on co-occurring anomalies. Five controls without gastrointestinal congenital malformations matched for residence and time of conception (± 1 year) were randomly selected for each case. Maternal risk factors were analyzed with data from the same registers.
resultsTotal prevalence of CA was 0.45/10,000, birth prevalence was 0.37/10,000 and live birth prevalence was 0.36/10,000. The overall prevalence trend did not change (p = 0.11) during the study period. There were 15 (41.7%) isolated cases, 3 (8.3%) were associated with known syndromes and 18 (50.0%) had multiple congenital anomalies. Together there were 19.4% (n = 7) terminations or neonatal mortalities. An association was observed with maternal diabetes and CA (p = 0.03).
conclusionThe prevalence of CA in Finland is low with no significant change over the study period. Despite the high frequency of associated anomalies, the overall survival of CA is very high, 97%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.