ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Photon-counting CT-derived hepatic extracellular volume quantification for noninvasive risk stratification of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH): a prospective cohort study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate whether photon-counting CT (PCCT)-derived hepatic extracellular volume (ECV) can serve as a noninvasive imaging biomarker to detect or exclude clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective single-center study included 113 participants with chronic liver disease who underwent contrast-enhanced liver PCCT between February 2022 and January 2025. Hepatic ECV was calculated from the delayed phase (5 min post-contrast). Liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by transient elastography (n = 79) and histological fibrosis grading (n = 34) served as reference standards. Correlations were evaluated using Spearman's ρ, and multivariable linear regression was applied to identify independent associations with LSM. Diagnostic performance for CSPH was assessed with ROC analysis using guideline-endorsed LSM thresholds (≤ 15 kPa to rule out; ≥ 25 kPa to rule in).
resultsHepatic PCCT-ECV showed strong correlations with fibrosis grade (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.001) and LSM (ρ = 0.83, p < 0.001). An ECV threshold of 27.7% identified CSPH (LSM ≥ 25 kPa) with 95% sensitivity and 93% specificity. To rule out CSPH (LSM ≤ 15 kPa), a threshold of 23.9% achieved 88% sensitivity and 97% specificity. In multivariable analysis including MELD score and platelet count, ECV remained independently associated with LSM. Inter-observer reproducibility was good (two-way random-effects, absolute agreement ICC = 0.83).
conclusionPCCT-derived ECV provides a promising noninvasive biomarker for identifying or excluding CSPH in patients with chronic liver disease. Given its reproducibility and integration into routine HCC surveillance imaging, ECV may support early risk stratification. Validation in multicenter settings is warranted. KEY POINTS: Question Can a quantitative biomarker from routine CT scans reliably stratify risk for clinically significant portal hypertension, overcoming limitations of current noninvasive methods? Findings Photon-counting CT-derived ECV accurately stratifies portal hypertension risk, offering high sensitivity (95%) for rule-in and high specificity (97%) for rule-out. Clinical relevance Integrating PCCT-ECV into routine surveillance CT provides an opportunistic, noninvasive tool for CSPH risk stratification, guiding timely patient management without requiring a separate examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.