Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41432749›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Sex classification using exocranial surfaces in a multi-population sample.

Markéta Hamanová Čechová, Barbora Suchá, Ján Dupej, Jaroslav Brůžek, Chiara Villa, Radoslav Beňuš, MennattAllah Hassan Attia, Šárka Bejdová, Ahmed Habiba, Tereza Meinerová and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Markéta Hamanová ČechováDepartment of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 44, Czech Republic. cechova.market@email.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-2236
Barbora SucháDepartment of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 44, Czech Republic.
Ján DupejDepartment of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-7977
Jaroslav BrůžekDepartment of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-9662
Chiara VillaSection of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksvej V's Vej 11, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-8131
Radoslav BeňušDepartment of Anthropology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, Bratislava 4, 84215, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-1689
MennattAllah Hassan AttiaDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champollion street, Al Mesallah Sharq, Qesm Al Attarin, Alexandria, 21517, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2304-532X
Šárka BejdováDepartment of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-7632
Ahmed HabibaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champollion street, Al Mesallah Sharq, Qesm Al Attarin, Alexandria, 21517, Egypt.
Tereza MeinerováDepartment of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6390-5227
Jana VelemínskáDepartment of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 44, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-951X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate individual identification of skeletal remains is indispensable in forensic contexts. The skull serves as an important source of information about the sex of human skeletal remains, and many different approaches have been published. High method success and reliability are prerequisites for the legal utilisation of results. However, the population specificity of variable sexual dimorphism typically reduce effectiveness. This study presents a verification of an innovative classification model using the exocranial surface across a multi-population sample. This sex estimation method proved to be highly reliable and accurate for Central European populations, achieving high accuracy rates for Czech (96%) and Slovak (92%) samples. The French sample had an accuracy of 90%, demonstrating the method's effectiveness in Southern European contexts. Prediction using the combined data from these three populations achieved a cross-validation accuracy of 91.74%. When this classifier model was applied to Egyptian crania, the accuracy dropped to 82%, and when applied to crania from a Danish dataset to 80%. The reasons for the failure of the classifier are the smaller degree of sexual dimorphism among Danes, and the more distinct morphological differences in males and females among Egyptians. These lower accuracy rates indicate that the classifier's reliability diminishes when applied to more diverse and geographically distant populations. The classifier does not work well when applied to a population other than that for which it was developed. The method is robust, and requires further refinement to achieve similar reliability across a broader range of populations.

Indexed as

Sex Determination by SkeletonSkullAdultEuropeFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMaleReproducibility of Results3D imaging methodsForensic anthropologyPopulation specificitySex estimationSexual dimorphismSkull

Identifiers

PMID41432749
PMCPMC12957628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.